Small signal testing using REW with a series resistance in the speaker leads would provide an impedance curve for the individual drivers. The cable which normally connects the SPL meter to the sound card Line-in socket is connected across the speaker terminals. REW then reads impedance against frequency. The resonant frequency of the drivers should be clearly shown by a peak in the frequency plot.
I used a small audio amplifier to provide the test signal after removing all the heavy cables from the IB's EP2500 power amp to the drivers. The big amp was unnecessarily powerful for testing when a 30 watt audio amp would do the job nicely. Naturally I pulled the mains plug from the socket on the back of the Behringer amp to avoid short circuits between the naked ends of the IB's speaker cables. It is all too easy, after making changes to the wiring, to switch everything back on without thinking. I am as prone as any other to being on auto pilot when it comes to my audio system.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5e8f/d5e8f9b0abb9b97bdcef123b688899a49424ec94" alt=""
Now onto the problem of measuring the reduction of Fs due to the manifold loading all of the drivers simultaneously. My fuzzy logic suggests that, individually, the drivers would not be loaded enough by air mass to notice my very large manifold even existed. So I connected all four drivers in parallel using lighting flex for a 1.8 Ohm (DC resistance) load. I wanted to see if there was any reduction of the combined Fs on a small signal. It seemed unlikely given the tiny driver excursions involved. After checking driver polarity with a 9 volt battery I used a 100 Ohms variable resistor in the positive leg of the cable from the speaker terminals of the audio amp. This was to ensure a clear impedance peak at the combined driver frequency resonance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20ba5/20ba5e084cf6ee128d197b483d9e709355fa3cdd" alt=""
The question is how any manifold air mass loading might take effect. Would it be linear and based on driver excursion? Does manifold size and opening affect the driver's Fs?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fec3/8fec381cf27d7cb13cc5d0196b2c76fabfa03193" alt=""
Just out of curiosity I closed off the mouth of the manifold with a piece of plywood to see the effect on impedance. The remaining open slot of about one inch width seemed to do nothing serious to the shape of the (closed door) curve but slightly reduced its level. I had made no changes to the REW settings or the test amplifier during these last three sweeps. I have raised the curve by a couple of dB using REW's trace adjustment to match the level of the earlier curves to aid comparison. The new trace is the red curve.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1c2f/b1c2f7382ea4c0d2528bceca306a72c0de852cbd" alt=""
BUT! Let's not jump to any false conclusions. Having just re-read my earlier posts I realise that my 32Hz drivers also exhibited a 12Hz peak when boosted at 20hz with the BFD. So it must be a room effect after all. I shall have to close off the stairwell with large piece of ply to see if I can kill that peak if only to satisfy my curiosity. I do know that my AV room is rather prone to exaggerate diesel rumbles from the distant road and delivery vehicles in the area.
My gratitude goes to aktiondan (a member of the HT Shack) for the clever suggestion of impedance measurement using REW and a series resistance. The original HT Shack thread was back in June 17 '07. Dan's original posts are well worthy of careful study. A direct link appears below:
http://www.hometheatershack.com/forums/rew-forum/5216-room-eq-wizard-doubles-crossover-design-measurement-tool.html?highlight=impedance+measurement
If clicking on the graphs doesn't provide a large enough image to show the detail then try the CTRL+ trick to magnify the whole page. CTRL0 will return the page to normal. CTRL- will shrink the page. Back click to return to the text.
*